Causal associations between site-specific cancer and diabetes risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Both cancer and diabetes are complex chronic diseases that have high economic costs for society. The co-occurrence of these two diseases in people is already well known. The causal effects of diabetes on the development of several malignancies have been established, but the reverse causation of these two diseases (e.g., what type of cancer can cause T2D) has been less investigated. Methods: Multiple Mendelian randomization (MR) methods, such as the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, weighted median method, MR-Egger, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test, were performed to evaluate the causal association of overall and eight site-specific cancers with diabetes risk using genome-wide association study summary data from different consortia, such as Finngen and UK biobank. Results: A suggestive level of evidence was observed for the causal association between lymphoid leukaemia and diabetes by using the IVW method in MR analyses (P = 0.033), indicating that lymphoid leukaemia increased diabetes risk with an odds ratio of 1.008 (95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.014). Sensitivity analyses using MR-Egger and weighted median methods showed consistent direction of the association compared with the IVW method. Overall and seven other site-specific cancers under investigation (i.e., multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and cancer of bladder, brain, stomach, lung, and pancreas) were not causally associated with diabetes risk. Conclusions: The causal relationship between lymphoid leukaemia and diabetes risk points to the necessity of diabetes prevention amongst leukaemia survivors as a strategy for ameliorating the associated disease burden.

Volumetric changes in specific neurofunctional subfields of the hippocampus in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: There is evidence that hippocampal volume is abnormal in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but there have been no studies on volumetric changes in different subfields based on functional topography. This was investigated in the present study by comparing hippocampal neurofunctional subfield volumes between MDD patients and healthy control (HC) subjects. METHODS: Patients with MDD (n = 44) and HCs (n = 27) recruited at Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated Hospital underwent a T1-weighted anatomical MRI scan in the sagittal orientation, and the data were used to calculate hippocampal subfield volumes. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the volumes and risk of MDD. A nomogram for predicting MDD risk based on volume changes in different subfields was developed, and its predictive power was evaluated by calculating the concordance (C)-index. RESULTS: Compared with HCs, MDD patients showed reduced volume in hippocampal neurofunctional subfields, specifically in left (L)1, right (R)1, and R2 (related to emotion) and L2, L3, and R4 (related to cognition and perception). The logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk of MDD was 4.59-, 5.8-, 8.33-, and 6.92-fold higher with atrophies of L1, L2, L3, and R4, respectively. A nomogram for predicting MDD risk was developed based on age; sex; and hippocampal L1, L2, L3, and R4 subfield volumes and showed good accuracy, with a C-index of 0.784. CONCLUSION: Volumetric changes in the neurofunctional subfield of the hippocampus are potential imaging markers that can predict the occurrence of MDD.

Luminal diameter ratio of Vieussens' arterial ring is valuable in determining appropriate clinical management for patients with pathologic Vieussens' arterial ring.

BACKGROUND: Although the adverse events of pathologic Vieussens' arterial ring (VAR) have been reported, it is difficult to determine optimal clinical management. Thus, we hypothesized that the luminal diameter ratio of VAR obtained from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could be used as a clinical tool to inform appropriate patient management. METHOD: A total of 29 patients with pathologic VAR were retrospectively recruited for this study. The VAR luminal diameter ratio was defined as a quotient of VAR fistula divided by the orifice of RCA or LAD, based on which, patients were divided into small fistula group and large fistula group. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were obtained from ROC curve. The cutoff value of the VAR luminal diameter ratio was calculated and assessed during the follow-up. RESULTS: The VAR luminal diameter ratio of fistula/RCA orifice was 0.505 ± 0.098 in small fistula group and 1.020 ± 0.150 in large fistula group. The VAR luminal diameter ratio of fistula/LAD orifice was 0.507 ± 0.123 in small fistula group and 1.039 ± 0.151 in large group. The value was correlated with the choice of the treatment (r = 0.643 p < 0.01, r = 0.627 p < 0.01). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.803, 54.5%, 100%, 100% and 78.3% of the fistula/RCA orifice ratio and 0.833, 63.64%, 94.44%, 87.5% and 81.0% of the fistula/LAD orifice ratio, respectively. The cutoff values of both fistula/RCA orifice and fistula/LAD orifice ratios were 0.676. CONCLUSIONS: The VAR luminal diameter ratio may be a valuable index to determine appropriate treatment for patients with pathologic VAR.